Declassified Clarke memo proves Rice lied

Here is the January 25, 2001, memo from counterterrorism coordinator Richard Clarke to national security advisor Condoleezza Rice - the first terrorism strategy paper of the Bush administration. The document was central to debates in the 9/11 hearings over the Bush administration's policies and actions on terrorism before September 11, 2001.

Clarke's memo requests an immediate meeting of the National Security Council's Principals Committee to discuss broad strategies for combating al-Qaeda by giving counterterrorism aid to the Northern Alliance and Uzbekistan, expanding the counterterrorism budget and responding to the U.S.S. Cole attack. Despite Clarke's request, there was no Principals Committee meeting on al-Qaeda until September 4, 2001. Note that the memo bears a declassification stamp of April 7, 2004, <span style="font-style:italic;">one day prior to Rice's testimony before the 9/11 Commission on April 8, 2004.</span> Responding to claims that she ignored the al-Qaeda threat before September 11, Rice <span style="font-style:italic;">lied </span>in a March 22, 2004 Washington Post op-ed when she wrote that, "No al Qaeda plan was turned over to the new administration."

Display:


Is this for real? (3.00 / 1)

I'm distributing this, but I'm not seeing a lot of information about where it came from.  I'm hoping this isn't another potential Rathergate.
by Drummond on Thu Feb 10, 2005 at 11:06:54 PM EST

Yea (none / 0)

Is this real?  I linked to the pdf and the op-ed
The Kentucky Democrat
by kydem on Fri Feb 11, 2005 at 12:20:16 AM EST

If not real I suspect Rove. (3.00 / 1)

It wouldn't surprise me if the rethugs try to cause further damage to SCLM reputation by feeding forged documents. It helps them to increase peoples suspicion of bias in the media.
by Commander in Chimp on Fri Feb 11, 2005 at 12:26:54 AM EST

Re: If not real I suspect Rove. (3.00 / 0)

That is the same feeling I had with Rathergate. Was that ever discussed here? I mean it could not have possibly worked out better for Georgie. Put to rest, once and for all, the speculation as to why he wouldn't take a flight physical (snifff) and blow Rather up at the same time. It is genius, if true, absolute genius.
by OxBuzzard on Fri Feb 11, 2005 at 01:24:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If not real I suspect Rove. (none / 0)

I thought the same thing at the time. But wasn't the guy who forged the docs at Kinkos a historical enemy of the Bush family?

Funny how the fake documents were so believable because they were based on probable truth, while the swift liar smears were based on complete falsehoods disproven for 30 years, yet they remained mostly intact in a large part of the electorate's mind.

http://operationyellowelephant.blogspot.com/
by Vote Hillary 2008 on Fri Feb 11, 2005 at 06:03:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Your best bet (none / 0)

Everyone is asking (wisely, I think) about the veracity of this document. I haven't seen it yet; I don't have a PDF viewer on this particular computer.

My long-term suggestion is we (meaning the Democratic Party) try to find someone who does fact checking for a living or maybe someone who is an expert on the verification of documents and put them on the payroll. I suspect we'll find this sort of problem cropping up a lot as the Republicans improve their propaganda machine.

No offense to Nanovirus, who has posted a potentially VERY useful document, but we should always note our sources for material we post in the future.

by Green Irishboy on Fri Feb 11, 2005 at 08:21:44 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.